Should of been the other one resign but so be it someone had to go
Home Secretary Amber Rudd has resigned, Downing Street has said, after claims she misled Parliament over targets for removing illegal migrants.
Ms Rudd, who was due to make a Commons statement on Monday, was under pressure to resign over the Windrush scandal.
She faced criticism over her knowledge of Home Office removals targets.
Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson said Ms Rudd was “carrying the can for the person originally responsible for this scandal – Theresa May”.
On Sunday, the Guardian published a letter to Theresa May, in which Ms Rudd set out her “ambitious but deliverable” aim to deport 10% more illegal immigrants over the “next few years.”
Ms Rudd telephoned the prime minister on Sunday evening to tell her of the decision amid intensifying opposition demands for her to quit.
A No 10 spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has tonight accepted the resignation of the Home Secretary.”
- Amber Rudd resigns: Live reaction
- What went wrong for Amber Rudd?
- Reality Check: Has the ‘hostile environment’ worked?
The Windrush row began when it emerged that some migrants from Commonwealth countries, who settled in the UK from the late 1940s to the 1970s, and their relatives, had been declared illegal immigrants.
Reacting to the resignation, Labour MP David Lammy said: “Amber Rudd resigned because she didn’t know what was going on in her own department and she had clearly lost the confidence of her own civil servants.
“The real issue is the hostile environment policy that caused this crisis in the first place.
“That policy must now be reviewed, and the Home Office must move quickly to compensate and grant citizenship to the Windush generation.”
How the ‘targets’ row unfolded:
- On Wednesday Ms Rudd told MPs investigating Windrush that there were no removals targets
- But an inspection report from December 2015 showed targets for voluntary removals did exist
- Ms Rudd then admitted “local” targets for voluntary removals had been set
- She told the Commons on Thursday she had not been aware of them
- The Guardian then reported a June 2017 memo from an official, copied to Ms Rudd, that refers to targets
- Ms Rudd said she had not seen this memo
- On Sunday evening, the Guardian published a letter from Ms Rudd to Theresa May setting out aims to increase enforced deportations
Giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee last week, Ms Rudd said there were no removals targets for illegal immigrants.
She later admitted “local” targets for voluntary removals had been set, but told the Commons on Thursday she had not been aware of them.
But the Guardian reported a June 2017 memo from an official, copied to Ms Rudd, that refers to targets.
The newspaper then published a letter, from January 2017, where Ms Rudd tells Theresa May about plans to restructure her department.
She tells Mrs May – her predecessor as home secretary – that she plans to focus on the “aim of increasing the number of enforced removals by more than 10% over the next few years, something I believe is ambitious, but deliverable”.
Ms Rudd’s aim of increasing “enforced deportations” would not have affected Windrush migrants, as they were threatened with “voluntary departure”.
The term “voluntary” describes the method of departure rather than the choice of whether or not to depart – those leaving in this way are able to approach the Home Office for financial assistance with travel costs.